经耳迷走神经刺激联合上肢康复机器人对脑卒中后上肢功能的疗效
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

湖北省自然科学基金襄阳创新发展联合基金项目(2025AFD126);襄阳市科技局研究项目[襄科计(2022)3号2022YL36B]


Effect of the rehabilitation robotic arm combined with transauricular vagus nerve stimulation on upper limb function recovery in stroke patients with hemiplegia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨经耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)联合上肢康复机器人训练双模式干预在促进脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能恢复中的效果。方法 选取2022年6月—2024年6月本院康复科住院的128例脑卒中患者,随机分为对照组、taVNS组、上肢康复机器人组和联合组4组,每组32例,治疗期为6周。对照组接受常规康复治疗;taVNS组除常规康复治疗外,额外进行经皮耳迷走神经刺激治疗;上肢康复机器人组则额外进行上肢康复机器人训练;联合组同时结合了taVNS与上肢康复机器人两种干预手段。在干预前后对各组患者进行多项指标测定与评估,包括运动诱发电位(MEP)皮质潜伏期、中枢运动传导时间(CMCT)、上肢运动功能量表(FMA)评分、日常生活能力改良Barthel指数(MBI)量表评分、检测大脑中动脉(MCA)血流速度变化。结果 在干预前,所有组别在MEP潜伏期、CMCT、上肢FMA评分、MBI评分和MCA血流速度方面,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);经治疗后,4组患者上述指标均较治疗前显著改善( P<0.05), taVNS组、上肢康复机器人组、联合组效果优于对照组,且联合组优于taVNS组、上肢康复机器人组(均P<0.05)。〖HTH〗结论 taVNS和上肢康复机器人均可改善脑卒中偏瘫患者患侧上肢的肌力,提高手的灵活度和上肢运动功能;且两者联合使用效果更佳

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) combined with the rehabilitation robotic arm reinforcement training on upper limb motor function recovery in stroke patients with hemiplegia.Methods 128 stroke patients admitted to the rehabilitation department of our hospital from June 2022 to June 2024 were randomly divided into a control group, taVNS group, rehabilitation robotic arm group, and combination group, with 32 patients in each group. The control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment, while the taVNS group received additional taVNS treatment on top of conventional rehabilitation treatment. The rehabilitation robotic arm group received additional neural rehabilitation robotic arm treatment on top of conventional rehabilitation treatment. The combination group received both taVNS and rehabilitation robotic arm treatment on top of conventional rehabilitation treatment for a total of 6 weeks. Four groups were tested for motor evoked potential (MEP) cortical latency and central motor conduction time (CMCT) in the affected brain area before and after treatment. The treatment effect was evaluated using the simplified Fugl Meyer assessment upper limb (FMA-UE) and modified Barthel index (MBI) scores, and the blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) on the affected side was measured. Results Before treatment, there were no significant differences in MEP latency, CMCT, FMA-UE score, MBI score, and MCA blood flow velocity among the four groups of patients (P>0.05). After treatment, all four groups of patients showed significant improvement in the above indicators compared to before treatment (P<0.05). The taVNS group, rehabilitation robotic arm group, and combination group had better effects than the control group, and the combination group was superior to the taVNS group and rehabilitation robotic arm group (P<0.05).Conclusion Both taVNS and rehabilitation robotic arm can improve the muscle strength of the affected upper limb in stroke patients with hemiplegia, enhance hand flexibility and upper limb motor function; And the combination of the two has a better effect

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-18
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司