机械取栓术中应用替罗非班治疗急性脑梗死对患者血小板计数、NIHSS评分和预后的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(201904b11020045)


Influence of tirofiban during mechanical thrombectomy on platelet count, NIHSS score and prognosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探究机械取栓术(MT)中应用替罗非班治疗急性脑梗死(ACI)对患者血小板计数(PLT)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分和预后的影响。方法 纳入2021年3月—2024年3月本院收治的行MT治疗的ACI患者132例,根据术中是否予以替罗非班治疗,将其分为MT组和替罗非班组。MT组予以Trevo支架实施MT治疗,替罗非班组在MT组基础上术中予以动脉内输注替罗非班治疗。入组患者经倾向性匹配评分法(卡钳值0.02)排除基线资料混杂因素影响,每组各获得66例基线资料可比的患者,对比两组近期疗效,术前及术后1、7 d 的NIHSS评分,术后血流分级,术前及术后1、7 d血液学指标[PLT、血小板聚集率、血小板黏附率、全血黏度、血浆黏度]水平变化,随访90 d内预后情况[改良Rankin量表(mRS)],并进行安全性评估。结果 术后7 d,替罗非班组近期疗效总有效率(96.97%)显著高于MT组(87.88%)(P<0.05);术后1 d,两组NIHSS评分下降,但无统计学差异(P>0.05),术后7 d,两组NIHSS评分显著下降(P<0.05),且替罗非班组显著低于MT组(P<0.05);两组术后血流分级无显著差异(P>0.05),但替罗非班组术后血流分级为3级的比例显著高于MT组(P<0.05);术后1、7 d,两组PLT、血小板聚集率、血小板黏附率、全血黏度及血浆黏度随时间推移显著下降(P<0.05),且替罗非班组术后1、7 d各指标水平显著低于MT组(P<0.05);随访90 d内,两组血管再闭、颅内出血、90 d内死亡等事件发生率无显著差异(P>0.05),但替罗非班组预后良好率显著高于MT组(P<0.05);随访90 d内,两组均未观察到支架移位或药物不良反应的情况。结论 在MT术中应用替罗非班可以提高ACI患者近期疗效,改善神经功能、术后血流分级、血小板凝集及血液流变学情况,改善预后结局,安全性良好,推荐应用

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the influence of tirofiban during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) on platelet count, NIHSS score and prognosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI). Methods ACI patients who received MT in the hospital from March 2021 to March 2024 were included. According to whether tirofiban was given during surgery, the patients were divided into tirofiban group and MT group. The MT group was given Trevo stent for MT treatment, while the tirofiban group was treated with intra-arterial infusion of tirofiban during surgery on the basis of the MT group. After excluding the influence of confounding factors of baseline data by propensity matching score method (caliper=0.02), 66 patients with comparable baseline data were obtained in each group. The short-term efficacy, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score before surgery and at 1 day and 7 days after surgery, postoperative blood flow grading, hematological indicators [platelet count (PLT), platelet aggregation rate, platelet adhesion rate, whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity] before surgery and at 1 and 7 days after surgery and prognosis status [modified Rankin scale (mRS)] within 90 days of follow-up were compared between groups, and the safety evaluation was performed. Results The total effective rate in tirofiban group (96.97%) was significantly higher than that in MT group (87.88%) (P<0.05). The NIHSS score in both groups was decreased at 1 day after surgery (P>0.05), and was significantly declined at 7 days after surgery (P<0.05), and the NIHSS score in tirofiban group was significantly lower than that in MT group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative blood flow grading between groups (P>0.05), but the number of patients with postoperative blood flow grade 3 was significantly more in tirofiban group than that in MT group (P<0.05). At 1 day and 7 days after surgery, the PLT, platelet aggregation rate, platelet adhesion rate, whole blood viscosity and plasma viscosity in both groups were decreased significantly with time (P<0.05), and the above indicators in tirofiban group at 1 day and 7 days after surgery were significantly lower than those in MT group (P<0.05). Within 90 days of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of vascular reocclusion, intracranial hemorrhage and death within 90 days between the two groups (P>0.05), but the rate of good prognosis in tirofiban group was significantly higher than that in MT group (P<0.05). During 90 days of follow-up, no stent displacement or adverse drug reactions were observed in both groups. Conclusion The application of tirofiban during MT can enhance the short-term efficacy of ACI patients, improve the neurological function, postoperative blood flow grading, platelet agglutination and hemorheology, and improve the prognosis outcome, and it has good safety

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-19
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司