腹腔镜下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌的疗效
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

双鸭山市科学技术局自筹经费科研项目(2022-158)


Efficacy of laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨结直肠癌使用腹腔镜下经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)的治疗效果及对炎症因子、免疫功能的影响。方法 选取2021年1月—2024年2月我院收治的94例结直肠癌患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组47例。对照组实施腹腔镜小切口手术,观察组实施腹腔镜NOSES手术。比较两组围术期指标(手术时间、出血量、术后首次下床时间、术后首次排气时间、首次进食时间及淋巴结清扫个数)、炎症因子[血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、C反应蛋白(CRP)及白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]、免疫功能[CD3+、CD4+、CD8+及CD4+/CD8+]、肛门功能[肛管静脉压、直肠最大耐受量、肛管最大收缩压]及并发症情况的差异。结果 与对照组相比,观察组手术时间更长,术中出血量更少,术后首次下床活动、排气及进食时间均更短(P<0.05);两组淋巴结清扫数无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术后1 d,两组TNF-α、CRP及IL-6较术前均上升,而观察组较对照组更低(P<0.05);两组CD3+、CD4+及CD4+/CD8+较术前均下降,而观察组较对照组更高(P<0.05)。术后3 d,两组肛管静脉压、直肠最大耐受量及肛管最大收缩压较术前均下降,而观察组较对照组更高(P<0.05)。观察组总并发症发生率(8.52%)低于对照组(25.54%)(P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜下NOSES术对结直肠癌患者具有更加微创的优势,可进一步缩短患者术后恢复时间,降低患者炎症反应,维持患者免疫功能和肛门功能

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in the treatment of colorectal cancer and its effect on inflammatory factors, immune function and anal function. Methods 94 patients with colorectal cancer were divided into control group (n=47) and observation group (n=47) randomly. The control group was treated with laparoscopic small incision surgery, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic NOSES. The perioperative related indicators [operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first time to get out of bed after operation, first time to exhaust after operation, first time to eat and number of lymph node dissection], inflammatory factors [serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)], immune function [CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+], anal function [anal venous pressure, rectal maximum tolerance, anal maximum systolic blood pressure] and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The observation group's operation time was longer comparing with the control group (P<0.05), intraoperative blood loss was less (P<0.05), and the first time of getting out of bed, exhaust time and eating time after operation were shorter (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (P>0.05). One day after operation, TNF-α, CRP and IL-6 in the two groups increased (P<0.05), while comparing with the control group, the observation group were lower (P<0.05). CD3+, CD4+ and CD4 +/CD8+ in the two groups decreased(P<0.05), while comparing with the control group, the observation group were lower (P<0.05). Three days after operation, the anal venous pressure, rectal maximum tolerance and anal maximum systolic pressure of the two groups decreased(P<0.05), and comparing with the control group, the observation group was higher(P<0.05). Compared with 25.54 % in the control group, the observation group’s total complications incidence was lower(P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic NOSES has a more minimally invasive advantage for patients with colorectal cancer, which can further shorten the postoperative recovery time, reduce the inflammatory response, and maintain the immune function and anal function of patients

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-21
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司