持续输注低剂量艾司氯胺酮对大面积烧伤患者疼痛的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

辽宁省应用基础研究计划项目(2023JH2/101300075)


Effect of continuous infusion of low dose esketamine on pain in patients with extensive burns
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨持续输注低剂量艾司氯胺酮对大面积烧伤患者疼痛的影响。方法 选取2023年1月—2024年2月我院收治的于全麻下对烧伤创面切痂植皮和换药的82例患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组41例。观察组切皮前持续输注5 μg/kg/min艾司氯胺酮(稀释至20 mL),对照组持续输注等容量的生理盐水。所有患者麻醉诱导、维持用药种类一致,且均按照药物说明使用。比较两组患者入室(T0),输注生理盐水/艾司氯胺酮即刻(T1)、手术切皮(T2)及出手术室时(T3)的心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)。切皮前、切皮后10 min及拔管后30 min,抽取静脉血测量应激指标[血糖(Glu)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(Cor)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)]水平。于拔管后30 min及术后(6、12、24 h)记录视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)。苏醒期Riker镇静躁动评分(SAS)、恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制等并发症。术前、术后1 d及术后3 d,采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估患者睡眠状况及采用汉化版烧伤专用疼痛-焦虑量表(C-BSPAS)评分评估患者术后焦虑状态。结果 在 T0和T1时,两组患者HR与MAP无统计学差异(P>0.05);而在T2和T3时刻,观察组HR和MAP低于对照组(P<0.05)。切皮前,两组静脉血Glu、NE、 Cor、 SOD均无统计学差异(P>0.05);切皮后10 min、拔管后30 min 观察组血清Glu、NE、 Cor、 SOD水平较对照组更低(P<0.05);与对照组相比,观察组苏醒期SAS评分更低(P<0.05),而苏醒期寒战、恶心呕吐等不良反应发生率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。与对照组相比,观察组在拔管后30 min及术后6 h、12 h VAS评分更低(P<0.05);术后24 h两组患者VAS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05);与对照组相比,观察组首次镇痛需求的时间更长且抢救性镇痛药的剂量更少(P<0.05)。术后1 d和3 d,与对照组相比,观察组PSQI及C-BSPAS评分更低。结论 持续输注低剂量艾司氯胺酮可有效缓解烧伤患者疼痛,提高患者舒适度,且未增加不良反应发生率,是烧伤患者镇痛的一种安全方式

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the effect of continuous infusion of low-dose esketamine on pain in patients with extensive burns. Methods A total of 82 patients who underwent debridement and skin grafting of burn wounds under general anesthesia from January 2023 to February 2024 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group received continuous infusion of 5 μg/kg/min esketamine before incision (diluted to 20 mL), while the control group received continuous infusion of the same volume of normal saline. The types of anesthetic induction and maintenance drugs were the same for all patients, and the drugs were used in accordance with the instructions. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at the time of entering the operating room (T0), immediately after the infusion of normal saline/esketamine (T1), during incision (T2), and when leaving the operating room (T3). Venous blood was drawn at the time of incision, 10 minutes after incision, and 30 minutes after extubation to measure the levels of stress indicators. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was recorded at 30 minutes after extubation and at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery. The sedation-agitation scale (SAS) for sedation and agitation, nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression and other complications were recorded at 30 minutes after extubation and at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery. Before surgery, 1 day after surgery, and 3 days after surgery, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and the Chinese version of the burn-specific pain anxiety scale (C-BSPAS) were scored. Results There was no statistically significant difference in HR and MAP between the two groups at T0-T1 (P>0.05); while at T2 and T3, the HR and MAP of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P <0.05). Before incision, there was no statistically significant difference in serum Glu, NE, Cor, and SOD levels between the two groups (P>0.05), but at 10 minutes after incision and 30 minutes after extubation, the levels of Glu, NE, Cor, and SOD in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the observation group was lower at 30 minutes after extubation and at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at 24 h after surgery (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the SAS score at the awakening period of the observation group was lower (P<0.05), while the incidence of complications such as coughing, shivering, nausea, and vomiting during the awakening period and after surgery was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group required a longer time for the first analgesic demand and used less rescue analgesic drugs (P<0.05). At 1 day and 3 days after surgery, the PSQI score and C-BSPAS score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group.Conclusion Continuous infusion of low dose esketamin can effectively improve the comfort of patients with burn pain, and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions. It is a safe way for burn patients to relieve pain

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-21
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司