基于病理数字切片的肿瘤AI诊断模型构建
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

2021—2022年度上海市促进产业高质量发展专项(人工智能专题)项目(2021-GZL-RGZN-01031)


Construction of a tumor AI diagnostic model based on pathology digital slices
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 构建基于病理数字切片的肿瘤人工智能(AI)诊断模型,并验证其诊断效能。方法 选取2022年1月—2024年1月复旦大学附属华东医院和复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院肿瘤(肺癌、胃癌、肝癌、大肠癌、乳腺癌、前列腺癌)患者100例,收集其病理组织切片共4000张,按8∶2的比例将患者分为训练组80例和验证组20例。数据集图像输入DeepLabV3+语义分割模型中,提取出数字图像的病理特征后输入ResNet50分类模型中训练,训练组分别输入两种数据集以构建肿瘤AI诊断模型,模型1输入仅标注病理组织(阳性标注)的数据集,模型2输入标注病理组织和正常组织(阳性及阴性标注)的数据集;验证组用于验证上述两种模型的诊断效能。对比两种模型诊断肿瘤的HE染色、ROC曲线分析、诊断效能分析结果。结果 HE染色显示,相比模型1,模型2能更清晰地显示肿瘤的病理组织范围与边界,更好地区分病理组织与正常组织;ROC曲线结果表明,模型1、模型2均可有效诊断肿瘤(P<0.05),且模型2诊断肿瘤的AUC、约登指数比模型1大,差异明显(P<0.05);模型2诊断肿瘤的敏感性、特异度、准确值及阳、阴性预测值比模型1大,差异明显(P<0.05)。结论 基于病理数字切片构建的肿瘤AI诊断模型对肿瘤的诊断效果优良,其中阳性及阴性标注模型对肿瘤有着更高的诊断效能,值得临床尝试实践

    Abstract:

    Objective To construct an artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic model for tumors based on digital pathology sections and validating its diagnostic efficacy. Methods Patients with tumors (lung cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer) at Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University and Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University were selected from January 2022 to January 2024, with a total of 100 cases, and a total of 4,000 pathological tissue sections were collected, and the patients were divided into a training group and a validation group according to the ratio of 8∶2, with 80 cases and 20 cases, respectively. The dataset images were input into DeepLabV3+ semantic segmentation model, and the pathological features of the digital images were extracted and input into ResNet50 classification model for training, and two kinds of datasets were input into the training group to construct the tumor AI diagnostic model respectively, model 1 inputs the dataset with only pathological tissues (positive annotation), and model 2 inputs the dataset with pathological tissues and normal tissues (positive and negative annotations). The validation group was used to verify the diagnostic efficacy of the above two models. Comparison of HE staining, ROC curve analysis and diagnostic efficacy analysis of the two models for tumor diagnosis. Results HE staining showed that compared with model 1, model 2 could display the pathological tissue extent and boundary of the tumor more clearly, and better distinguish pathological tissue from normal tissue; the results of ROC curve showed that both model 1 and model 2 could diagnose the tumor efficiently (P<0.05), and the AUC and Jordon's index of diagnosing the tumor in model 2 were larger than that of model 1, with obvious differences (P<0.05); the Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy value and positive and negative predictive values were greater than model 1, with significant differences (P<0.05).Conclusion Tumor AI diagnostic models constructed based on pathology digital sections have excellent diagnostic effects on tumors, in which positive and negative labeling models have higher diagnostic efficacy for tumors, which is worth clinical attempts and practice

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-20
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司