局麻与全麻下输尿管软镜手术治疗上尿路结石的疗效对比及围术期的疼痛管理
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0079)


Comparison of the clinical efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy under local and general anesthesia in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi and perioperative pain management
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨局部麻醉与全身麻醉下输尿管软镜钬激光碎石手术(FURS)治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效,探索局麻FURS围术期的疼痛管理方案。方法 收集2021年09月—2023年01月重庆医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科接受FURS治疗的341例上尿路结石患者的临床资料,行回顾性分析。按不同麻醉方式分为局部麻醉组(LA组,n=165)和全身麻醉组(GA组,n=176),比较两组患者的手术清石率、手术并发症、手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、麻醉费用、术后2、6 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和血流动力学指标等,比较LA组患者术中不同时间节点VAS评分。结果 两组患者的性别、年龄、BMI、ASA 分级、结石情况、肾积水情况、术前留置输尿管支架时长、术前感染指标等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者的手术清石率、手术并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LA组患者手术时间、住院时间、住院费用及麻醉费用低于GA组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LA组患者术后2、6 h VAS评分高于GA组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对比LA组患者术中不同时间节点VAS评分,行输尿管镜检时评分最高,安置负压吸引软镜鞘时次之,行激光碎石时最低(P<0.05)。术中行输尿管镜检时,LA组平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)指标升高,GA组降低(P<0.05)。LA组术后并发症发生率、术后发热率、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)发生率低于GA组,恶性呕吐发生率高于GA组(均P<0.05)。结论 输尿管软镜碎石手术在局麻与全麻下施行均安全有效,并且局麻FURS的麻醉风险更小、术后恢复更快、住院时间更短、住院费用更低、术后炎症反应更轻。局麻FURS术中行输尿管镜检时疼痛最为明显,通过术前的充分评估和宣教,及时启动围术期疼痛管理方案,局麻FURS同样可取得满意的临床疗效

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURS) under local and general anesthesia in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi,and preliminarily explore the management strategy of perioperative pain. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 341 patients with upper urinary calculi who received FURS treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September 2021 to January 2023. According to the different anesthesia methods, they were divided into local anesthesia group (LA group,165 cases) and general anesthesia group (GA group,176 cases). Stone free rate(SFR), postoperative complications, surgical time, hospital stay, hospitalization costs, anesthesia costs, 2-h and 6-h postoperative VAS scores and hemodynamic indicators were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scores (VAS) at different time points during the perioperative period in LA group were compared. Results There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, stone characteristics, underlying disease, duration of ureteral stent indwelling, inflammatory markers and other preoperative general data between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in SFR and total complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The surgical time, hospital stay, hospitalization cost and anesthesia cost in LA group were lower than those in GA group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). After operation, VAS scores in LA group at 2 hours and 6 hours were higher than those in GA group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). VAS assessment at different time points in the LA group showed the highest pain score when performing the ureteroscopy, second when placing the ureteral access sheath and the lowest when performing holmium laser lithotripsy, with statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion The FURS can be safely and effectively performed under local anesthesia or general anesthesia, and local anesthesia provides lower anesthesia risk, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay,lower hospital cost and less inflammation. Under local anesthesia, the pain of FURS during ureteroscopy is the most obvious, but better clinical effects can also be achieved through comprehensive evaluation, adequate preoperative education and timely initiation of perioperative pain management programs

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-19
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司