C-TIRADS及BRAFV600E基因检测对细针穿刺细胞学难以定性的甲状腺结节的诊断价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

江苏省重点社会发展项目(BE2018703);江苏省第五期“333高层次人才培养工程”项目(LGY2018063)


The diagnostic value of C-TIRADS and BRAFV600E gene mutation for indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨中国版甲状腺影像数据与报告系统(C-TIRADS)、BRAFV600E 基因检测及二者联合对细针穿刺细胞学难以定性的甲状腺结节的诊断价值。方法 纳入我院2020年1月—2021年4月的甲状腺手术患者53例行回顾性分析,术前完成超声、细针穿刺抽吸及BRAFV600E基因检测,选取细针穿刺细胞学难以定性的患者作为研究对象,53例患者共62个结节。以手术病理结果作为金标准,比较C-TIRADS、BRAFV600E基因检测及二者联合诊断对甲状腺结节的诊断效能。结果 C-TIRADS诊断甲状腺癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为92.50%、50.00%、77.08%、78.57%、77.42%。BRAFV600E基因诊断甲状腺癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为55.00%、100.00%、100.00%、55.00%、70.97%。C-TIRADS联合BRAFV600E基因诊断甲状腺癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为95.00%、50.00%、77.55%、84.62%、79.03%。C-TIRADS及联合诊断对甲状腺癌诊断的敏感性高于BRAFV600E基因检测(P<0.001),BRAFV600E基因检测特异性及阳性预测值高于C-TIRADS及联合诊断(P<0.05)。C-TIRADS、BRAFV600E基因检测及联合诊断对甲状腺癌诊断的阴性预测值和准确性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 C-TIRADS及BRAFV600E基因检测对于细胞学难以定性的甲状腺结节均有良好的诊断效能,术前联合应用可以更好地评估甲状腺结节

    Abstract:

    Objective To research the diagnostic value of C-TIRADS(Chinese-TIRADS), BRAFV600E gene detection and the combination of indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules. Methods To collect the patients who finished thyroid ultrasound, fine needle aspiration and BRAFV600E gene detection before operation from February 2020 to April 2021, 62 nodules from 53 patients with the indeterminate cytology were chosen as samples respectively. The diagnostic value of C-TIRADS (Chinese-TIRADS), BRAFV600E gene detection and the combination was compared with the operative pathology as gold standard. ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of C-TIRADS in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer were 92.50%, 50.00%, 77.08%, 78.57% and 77.42%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of BRAFV600E gene in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer were 55.00%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 55.00% and 70.97%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the combination were 95.00%, 50.00%, 77.55%, 84.62%, 79.03%, respectively. C-TIRADS and the combination were significantly more sensitive to thyroid cancer than BRAFV600E gene (P=0.000). The specificity and positive predictive value of BRAFV600E gene were significantly higher than C-TIRADS and the combination (P<0.05). The negative predictive value and accuracy of thyroid cancer diagnosis had no significant differences among C-TIRADS, BRAFV600E gene detection and the combination. Conclusion C-TIRADS and BRAFV600E have good diagnostic efficacy for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology, and the preoperative combination can evaluate thyroid nodules better

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-20
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司