肺部超声对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征分级的诊断价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81771848,82171702);江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F202067);镇江市重点研发计划-社会发展项目(SH2020046)


Diagnostic value of pulmonary ultrasonography in the grading of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    研究肺部超声对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)分级的诊断价值。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月—2021年7月在江苏大学附属医院及江苏大学附属人民医院新生儿科住院并经临床及胸部X线确诊的120名NRDS患儿和80名对照组新生儿。受试对象均进行肺部超声(LUS)检查,确定LUS评分和肺实变面积,应用受试者曲线(ROC)分析LUS评分和肺实变面积以评估NRDS分级。结果 NRDS患儿的LUS评分高于非NRDS患儿(P<0.05)。NRDS患儿的LUS评分随着NRDS严重程度的增加而增加(P<0.05)。对照组新生儿无肺实变区,NRDS患儿的肺实变区数量也随着NRDS严重程度的增加而增加(P <0.05)。LUS评分诊断NRDS的ROC曲线下面积为0.928,最佳截断值为19.2,敏感性、特异性分别94.2%、99.0%。LUS评分鉴别诊断重度与轻度/中度NRDS的ROC曲线下面积为0.993,最佳截断值为25.5,敏感性、特异性分别91.7%、97.5%。LUS评分评估机械通气的ROC曲线下面积为0.955,最佳截断值为27.5,敏感性、特异性分别83.9%、97.6%。结论 LUS评分和肺实变区可以鉴别诊断NRDS与非NRDS,用于NRDS的分级,预测机械通气,对患儿的治疗监测提供重要信息和依据

    Abstract:

    To study the diagnostic value of pulmonary ultrasound in the grading of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 120 children with NRDS and 80 neonates in the control group who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University and the Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University from January 2019 to July 2021 and confirmed by clinical, chest X-ray. Lung ultrasound (LUS) examination was performed to determine LUS score and lung consolidation area. The LUS score and lung consolidation area were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess NRDS grading. Results The LUS score of NRDS children was higher than that of non-NRDS children (25.16±3.49 vs 15-06±2.28), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The LUS score of children with NRDS increased with the increase of NRDS severity (20.85±0.61 vs 23.66±1.63 vs 29.16±1.51, P<0.05). In the control group, there was no lung consolidation area, and the number of lung consolidation area in NRDS children also increased with the increase of NRDS severity (0.32±0.29 vs1.73± 0.65 vs4.16±0.69, P<0.05). LUS score was used to diagnose NRDS. The area under ROC curve was 0.928, the optimal cut-off value was 19.2, and the sensitivity and specificity were 94. 2% and 99. 0%, respectively. LUS score differentiated the diagnosis of severe NRDS from mild/moderate NRDS. The area under the ROC curve was 0.993, the optimal cut-off value was 25.5, and the sensitivity and specificity were 91.7% and 97.5%, respectively. LUS score was used to evaluate mechanical ventilation. The area under ROC curve was 0.955, the optimal cut-off value was 27.5, and the sensitivity and specificity were 83.9% and 97. 6%, respectively.Conclusion LUS score and lung consolidation area can differentiate NRDS from non-NRDs, classify NRDS, predict mechanical ventilation, and provide important information and basis for the treatment and monitoring of children

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-19
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司