徒手心肺复苏和机械辅助心肺复苏对呼吸心跳骤停患者心脑缺血性损伤的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Effects of manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on ischemic cardiac/cerebral injury in patients with respiratory and cardiac arrest
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    探讨徒手心肺复苏(CPR)和机械辅助CPR对呼吸心跳骤停患者心脑缺血性损伤的影响。方法 选取2018年1月~2021年6月我院抢救的108例呼吸心跳骤停患者为研究对象,其中2018年1月~2019年10月采用徒手CPR的52例患者设为对照组,2019年11月~2021年6月采用机械辅助CPR的56例患者设为研究组,使用心肺复苏机替代徒手心脏按压。两组均建立高级气道进行机械通气。比较两组的CPR成功率及CPR持续时间。比较两组CPR成功患者在CPR 15 min和30 min的脑血流灌注、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)、血氧饱和度(SaO2)、血压、血乳酸水平。结果 研究组CPR成功率高于对照组(P<0.05),研究组CPR持续时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。在CPR 15 min和30 min,研究组的平均脑血流速度、平均脑血流量均高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组的PaO2和PETCO2高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组的收缩压和舒张压、SaO2均高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组的血乳酸水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 与徒手CPR相比,机械辅助CPR的抢救成功率更高,可更快恢复脑血流灌注、改善低氧血症,减少心脑缺血性损伤。

    Abstract:

    To investigate the effects of manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and mechanical assisted CPR on ischemic cardiac/cerebral injury in patients with respiratory and cardiac arrest.Methods 108 patients with respiratory and cardiac arrest rescued in the hospital were selected from January 2018 to June 2021. Among them, 52 patients undergoing manual CPR between January 2018 and October 2019 were included in the control group, and 56 patients undergoing mechanical assisted CPR, namely, using a cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine instead of manual compression from November 2019 to June 2021 were included in the study group. Advanced airway was established for mechanical ventilation in both groups. The success rate and duration of CPR were compared between the two groups. Cerebral blood perfusion, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), end expiratory carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2), blood oxygen saturation (SaO2), blood pressure, and blood lactate levels of patients with successful CPR after 15 min and 30 min of CPR were compared between the two groups. Results The success rate of CPR in the study group was 30.36%, higher than 13.46% in the control group (P<0.05), and the duration of CPR was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). After 15 min and 30 min of CPR, the mean cerebral blood flow velocity and mean cerebral blood flow of the study group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). PaO2 and PETCO2 of the study group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The systolic and diastolic blood pressure and SaO2 of study group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), and the blood lactic acid level was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with manual CPR, mechanical assisted CPR can achieve a higher success rate of rescue, faster recovery of cerebral blood perfusion and improvement of hypoxemia, and reduce ischemic cardiac/cerebral injury.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-12-21
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司