肝素结合蛋白对急腹症并发脓毒症的预测价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(52073269)


Heparinbinding protein as a predictor of acute abdomen complicated with sepsis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    比较肝素结合蛋白(HBP)、降钙素原(PCT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)及白细胞(WBC)计数反应急腹症并发脓毒血症的情况,评价肝素结合蛋白的诊断急腹症并发脓毒血症的诊断效果。方法 回顾性分析2020年9月~2021年9月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院南区急诊科和ICU收治的88例急腹症患者的临床资料,其中急腹症未并发脓毒症患者36例(对照组),急腹症并发脓毒症患者36例(脓毒症组),急腹症并发脓毒症休克患者16例(脓毒症休克组)。测定各组患者HBP、PCT、CRP和WBC水平,利用非参数检验分析比较各组间检测指标的差异;通过ROC曲线分析各检测指标对脓毒症的检测效能;Spearman相关检验分析HBP与PCT、CRP和WBC等指标的相关性。结果 脓毒症组与脓毒症休克组HBP、PCT、CRP水平比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),WBC水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。HBP在诊断急腹症并发脓毒症的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.941,高于PCT、CRP和WBC。HBP最佳诊断界值为55.7 ng/mL,此时HBP的敏感度为0.972,特异性为0.861。结论 HBP在急腹症并发脓毒症早期诊断及临床分级方面,优于PCT、CRP及WBC,可能具有较好的临床应用价值。

    Abstract:

    To identify the value and effectiveness of heparin-binding protein (HBP) in predicting acute abdomen complicated with sepsis as a diagnostic marker based on a comparative analysis of HBP, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count in patients with acute abdomen complicated with sepsis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 88 patients who were admitted to the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the South Division of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC due to acute abdomen during September 2020 and September 2021. The patients were assigned to a control group (acute abdomen without sepsis, n=36), a group of acute abdomen complicated with sepsis (AAS group, n=36), and a group of acute abdomen complicated with septic shock (AASS group, n=16). HBP, PCT, CRP, and WBC levels were measured and compared using nonparametric methods; ROC curve analysis was utilized to assess the efficiency of these markers in the screening for sepsis; Spearman's correlation was employed to analyze the correlations of HBP with PCT, CRP, and WBC. Results Between the AAS group and the AASS group, there was significant difference in HBP, PCT, and CRP (P<0.05) while there is no statistical significance in WBC (P>0.05). In terms of predicting acute abdomen complicated with sepsis, HBP yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.941, larger than those of PCT, CRP, and WBC. With HBP as a diagnostic marker, the optimal cutoff value was 55.7 ng/mL, in which case the sensitivity was 0.972, and the specificity was 0.861. Conclusion HBP outperforms PCT, CRP, and WBC in the early diagnosis and clinical stratification of acute abdomen complicated with sepsis and appears to be a promising predictor of the condition in clinical application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-12-21
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司