腔镜下两种不同入路方式治疗对甲状腺乳头状癌患者淋巴结清扫及术后疼痛的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

四川省卫生健康委员会科研项目(19PJ286)


Influence of two different approaches of endoscopic treatment onlymph node dissection, postoperative pain and in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 分析经口腔前庭与经乳晕入路腔镜下两种不同方式对甲状腺乳头状癌患者的治疗效果和影响。方法 收集我院2019年1月~2021年2月收治的甲状腺乳头状癌患者130例的临床资料,按照两种不同的腔镜入路方式分为口腔组(经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺乳头状癌手术组)66例和乳晕组(经乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺乳头状癌手术组)64例。比较两组患者的淋巴结清扫情况,术后即刻、术后12、24及48 h的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分结果,手术相关指标(手术时间、出血量、住院时间),术后并发症(术后出血、喉返神经损伤、感染等)的发生率;比较术后Vancouver疤痕评定量表(VSS)与患者和观察者瘢痕评价量表(POSAS)评分结果。结果 两组患者气管食管旁和气管前喉前淋巴结清扫数量无明显变化(P>0.05),口腔组患者中央区淋巴结清扫数量更多和时间较乳晕组明显降低(P<0.01)。术后即刻两组患者疼痛评分无明显差异(P>0.05),术后时间越长口腔组患者疼痛评分较乳晕组越低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组患者手术相关指标和术后并发症发生情况无明显差异(P>0.05)。口腔组患者术后温哥华瘢痕评估量表(VSS) 与患者和观察者瘢痕评价量表中的观察者部分(OSAS)评分较乳晕组明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 经口腔前庭入路腔镜下治疗甲状腺乳头状癌较经乳晕入路的中央淋巴结清扫数量更多且用时短,美观程度也优于经乳晕腔镜治疗,但两者术后疼痛水平变化、手术相关指标以及并发症情况没有明显差异。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect and influence of two different methods of endoscopic treatment via oral vestibule approach or areola approach on patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Methods The clinical data of 130 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma admitted to the hospital were collected between January 2019 and February 2021, and the patients divided into oral group (endoscopic papillary thyroid carcinoma surgery via oral vestibule approach, 66 cases) and areola group (endoscopic papillary thyroid carcinoma surgery via areola approach, 64 cases) according to two different endoscopic approaches. The lymph node dissection, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score immediately after surgery, at 12 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery and 48 h after surgery, surgery-related indicators (surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay) and incidence rates of postoperative complications (postoperative hemorrhage, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, infection, etc.) as well as scores of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results In terms of lymph node dissection status, there was no significant change in the number of lymph node dissections in the paratracheal esophagus and anterior larynx in the two groups (P>0.05). The number and duration of lymph node dissection in central region of oral group were significantly less or shorter than those in areola group (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in pain VAS score between the two groups immediately after surgery (P>0.05). The longer the postoperative time, the lower the pain score of oral group than areola group (P<0.01). As for surgical indicators and occurrence of complications, there were no statistical differences in surgery-related indicators and occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The scores of VSS scale and observer scar assessment scale (OSAS) of POSAS scale of oral group were significantly decreased compared with those in areola group (P<0.01). Conclusion Endoscopic treatment via oral vestibule approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma has more central lymph node dissections, shorter surgical time and better aesthetics than endoscopic treatment via areola approach, but there are no significant differences in postoperative pain, surgery-related indicators and complications between the two approaches.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-20
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司