岭南传统天灸疗法治疗非特异性腰痛的临床研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

广东省中医药局科研项目


Clinical research of conventional Tianjiu on nonspecific low back pain
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 探讨岭南传统天灸疗法治疗寒湿型非特异性腰痛的临床疗效。方法纳入2019年7月~2020年12月分别在广东省中医院珠海医院、西藏林芝市藏医院招募的相关非特异性腰痛患者114例,将纳入者按1:1:1比例随机分为天灸组(予岭南传统天灸穴位贴敷治疗)、药浴组(予“五味甘露散”药浴浸泡)和西药组(予塞来昔布治疗)。3组患者均接受1个疗程的治疗,分别于治疗前、治疗疗程结束时、随访时(治疗疗程结束后1个月和2个月)进行患者疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。结果共脱落5例,3组患者性别、年龄、VAS和ODI评分等基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);1个疗程后3组患者主要疗效评价指标 VAS和ODI与治疗前相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),提示传统疗法与西药组疗效相当;治疗结束后两个月随访,天灸组和药浴组VAS和ODI评分均低于西药组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),提示在腰痛复发率方面,传统疗法优于西药组。结论岭南传统天灸疗法治疗非特异性腰痛是一种简便有效安全的中医特色疗法,值得临床借鉴及推广。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To observe the clinical effect of traditional therapy on syndrome of cold-dampness in nonspecific low back pain. Methods114 patients were randomly divided into Tianjiu group (treatment with conventional Tianjiu),Tibet medicine bath group (treatment with “Wuwei-Ganlu”),and control group (treatment with celecoxib) in a ratio of 1:1:1 for one treatment course. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) scores of patients in each group were measured before treatment,at the end of treatment course,and at 1 and 2 months after treatment course. ResultsFive patients did not finish the therapy,and 38,37,and 34 patients were included for statistical in Tianjiu group,Tibet medicine bath group,and control group,respectively. There were no significant difference in gender,age,VAS and ODI scores among the three groups (P>0.05),suggesting that the baseline of patients in the three groups was consistent. However,at the end of 1 course of treatment,the primary efficacy evaluation indexes VAS and ODI of 3 groups were significantly different from those before treatment (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). These results suggesting that the efficacy of traditional therapy was comparable to that of western medicine group. Two months after the end of treatment,VAS and ODI scores in Tianjiu group and Tibet medicine bath group were lower than those in control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). It is suggesting that traditional therapy was better than the treatment of celecoxib in the recurrence rate of low back pain. ConclusionLingnan conventional Tianjiu is an effective and safe traditional therapy for nonspecific low back pain,which is worth popularizing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-20
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司