单纯抗凝与联合血管内治疗重症颅内静脉窦血栓形成患者的结局比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

云南省颅脑损伤研究中心资助项目;昆明市科技计划项目


Comparison of outcomes of simple anticoagulation and combined intravascular therapy for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 比较单纯抗凝与联合血管内治疗重症颅内静脉窦血栓形成(CVST)患者的结局。 方法 回顾性分析2013年1月~2019年6月昆明医科大学附属甘美医院收治的39例CVST患者的临床资料。根据治疗方式不同分为单纯抗凝治疗组(保守组)19例与抗凝联合血管内治疗组(手术组)20例。比较两组患者不良反应发生率、血管再通率、结局良好率、格拉斯哥昏迷指数(GCS)、改良 Rankin量表(mRS)的差异。 结果 两组患者出院GCS评分均显著高于入院GCS评分 (P<0.05);手术组血管再通率显著高于保守组 (P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术组结局良好率显著高于保守组 (P<0.05);手术组出院时、出院3月、出院6月mRS评分显著低于单纯抗凝组 (P<0.05)。 结论 抗凝联合血管内治疗重症颅内静脉窦血栓形成患者出院后预后较好的可能性更大,可作为单纯治疗后效果不佳患者的备用方法。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the efficacy of anticoagulation alone and combined endovascular therapy for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Methods Patients with CVST who received anticoagulation alone or combined endovascular therapy in The Affiliated Ganmei Hospital of Kunming Medical University between January 2013 and June 2019 were retrospectively collected. A total of 39 patients were eligible for inclusion,including 19 in the simple anticoagulation group (Conservative Group) and 20 in the combined group (Surgical group). The incidence of adverse reactions,the rate of vascular recanalization and the rate of good outcome were compared between the two groups. Differences in Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS),a modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results The discharge GCS score of the combined group and the Conservative Group was higher than that of the admission group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The vascular recanalization rate of the combined group was significantly higher than that of the Conservative Group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05),while the incidence of adverse reactions was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The rate of good outcome in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the Conservative Group,with statistical significance (P<0.05). The mRS score of the combined group at discharge,3 months after discharge and 6 months after discharge was significantly lower than that of the Conservative Group,with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Anticoagulant combined with endovascular treatment for severe CVST patients may have better prognosis after discharge,which can be used as a standby method for patients with poor efficacy after treatment alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-02-18
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司