右旋氯胺酮联合右美托咪定或咪达唑仑对泌尿系内镜检查患者的镇静效果对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

辽宁省自然科学基金


Analysis of sedative effects of S-ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine or midazolam on patients undergoing urinary endoscopy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨右旋氯胺酮分别联合右美托咪定(Dexmedetomidine)、咪达唑仑(Midazolam)应用于泌尿系内镜检查患者的镇静效果。 方法 收集中国医科大学肿瘤医院泌尿科行内镜检查患者68例的临床资料,镇静方案采用右旋氯胺酮联合右美托咪定者纳入D组(n=37),右旋氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑者纳入M组(n=31)。比较入室后(T1)、给药完毕时(T2)、检查15 min时(T3)、检查结束时(T4),两组患者生命体征[心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)]水平变化,对比两组患者右旋氯胺酮用量、麻醉恢复时间及药物不良反应发生率。 结果 T2、T3、T4时,D组患者HR水平均较T1时有显著下降(P<0.05),与M组间同一时间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);D组患者MAP、SpO2水平均较T1时无明显变化(P>0.05),但MAP明显低于同期M组(P<0.05)。两组患者检查持续时间及恶心/呕吐、谵妄发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),D组患者右旋氯胺酮用量、麻醉恢复时间、离室时间及呼吸抑制发生率均明显少于M组(P<0.05)。结论 右旋氯胺酮联合右美托咪定用于泌尿系内镜检查患者时,患者生命体征稳定性更高,可减少右旋氯胺酮用量,且患者恢复时间缩短。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the sedative effects of S-ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine or midazolam in patients undergoing urinary endoscopy. Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with urinary endoscopy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients with sedation regimen of S-ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine were included in group D (n=37), and patients with S-ketamine combined with midazolam were included in group M (n=31). The vital signs [heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2)] were compared between the two groups after entering the room (T1), at the end of administration (T2), at 15 min of examination (T3) and at the end of examination (T4). The differences of relevant examination indicators and incidence rate of adverse drug reactions were analyzed in the two groups. Results At T2, T3 and T4, the HR levels in the two groups were significantly lower than those at T1 (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at the same time (P>0.05). The levels of MAP and SpO2 in group D were not significantly changed compared with those at T1 (P>0.05), but they were significantly higher than those in group M at the same time (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the duration of examination and incidence rates of nausea/vomiting and delirium between the two groups (P>0.05). The S-ketamine dosage, body recovery time, departure time from room and incidence rates of bradycardia and respiratory depression in group D were significantly less than those in group M (P<0.05). Conclusion S-Ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine can increase the stability of vital signs in patients with urinary endoscopy. The safety of this sedative drug regimen is ideal, which is beneficial to the rapid body recovery after examination.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-02-18
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司