CT对肝细胞癌射频消融术后疗效的评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(81050033);四川省科技支撑计划项目(2011SZ0237)


CT evaluation of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】目的 探讨CT对肝细胞癌(HCC)射频消融(RFA)术后不同疗效评价的可行性。方法 回顾性收集2018年1月~2020年1月川北医学院附属医院接受RFA治疗的HCC患者53例,共65个病灶。分析患者治疗前及治疗后随访的CT平扫及三期增强图像,评价肿瘤完全消融、肿瘤残余、局部肿瘤进展及新发肿瘤,分别计算其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性。结果 ①完全消融,CT检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为66.7%、86.4%、70%、84.4%、80%。②肿瘤残余,CT检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为54.5%、85.2%、42.9%、90.2%、80%。③局部肿瘤进展,术后3个月以内CT检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为57.1%、88.7%、40%、94%、85%。术后3个月以后CT检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为80%、93.8%、57.1%、97.8%、92.5%。④肝内新发肿瘤,术后3个月以内CT检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为66.7%、93%、57.1%、95.2%、89.8%。术后3个月以后CT检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为76.9%、94.3%、83.3%、91.7%、89.6%。结论 CT对肝细胞癌射频消融术后3个月以后的局部肿瘤进展及肝内新发肿瘤的评价效果良好,对肿瘤完全消融及术后3个月以内肝内新发肿瘤具有较好的诊断价值,对肿瘤残余及术后3个月以内局部肿瘤进展具有一定的诊断价值。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】Objective To investigate features of therapeutic effects of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on CT. Methods From January 2018 to January 2020, 53 HCC patients with a total of 65 lesions treated by RFA underwent CT plain scan and triple-phase contrast-enhanced scans before the previous treatments and were followed up after this therapy and the CT data were retrospectively collected. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CT for detecting complete ablation, tumor residual, local tumor progression and new tumor were statistically calculated. Results For showing complete ablation, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CT were 66.7%, 86.4%, 70%, 84.4% and 80%, respectively. For detecting tumor residual, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CT were 54.5%, 85.2%, 42.9%, 90.2% and 80.0%, respectively. For demonstrating local tumor progression within 3 months after RFA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of followup CT were 57.1%, 88.7%, 40%, 94% and 85%, respectively. For depicting local tumor progression beyond 3 months after RFA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CT were 80%, 93.8%, 57.1%, 97.8% and 92.5%, respectively. For demonstrating new tumor in liver within 3 months after RFA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of follow-up CT were 66.7%, 93%, 57.1%, 95.2% and 89.8%, respectively. For new tumor in liver beyond 3 months after RFA,the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CT were 76.9%, 94.3%, 83.3%, 91.7% and 89.6%, respectively. Conclusion When CT is used to evaluate the efficacy of RFA of HCC, it has a very good effect on the evaluation of local tumor progression and hepatic new tumor after 3 months, it has a good effect on the evaluation of complete ablation and hepatic new tumor within 3 months, and it has a certain value on the evaluation of tumor residual and local tumor progression within 3 months.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-06-03
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司