子宫动脉灌注化疗栓塞术联合超声引导清宫术治疗瘢痕妊娠
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

四川省科技厅重点研发项目(2019YFS0403)


Uterine artery infusion chemoembolization combined with ultrasound-guided curettage for scar pregnancy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】目的 探讨子宫动脉灌注化疗栓塞术(UACE)联合超声引导清宫术治疗瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的临床应用效果。方法 回顾性分析2016年3月~2019年8月我院收治的150例CSP患者的临床资料,根据不同治疗方式分为观察组107例和对照组43例。观察组采用UACE联合超声引导清宫术,对照组采用肌肉注射甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合超声引导清宫术。对比两组临床治疗效果、清宫手术时间、术中和术后出血量、术后出血时间、住院时间、血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)下降至正常时间。结果 观察组清宫手术时间、术中及术后出血量、术后出血时间、住院时间、血β-HCG下降至正常时间等均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者未出现严重栓塞后并发症,其中清宫失败2例(1.8%),均属Ⅲ型CSP,转行腹腔镜下妊娠物清除术及子宫修补术治疗;对照组清宫失败6例(13.9%),清宫术中出血较多而急诊行子宫动脉栓塞术进行止血,术后再次清宫成功,两组治疗失败率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 子宫动脉灌注化疗栓塞术联合超声引导清宫术治疗瘢痕妊娠疗效确切, 创伤小、恢复快,可实现患者的保育愿望,可在临床作为常规治疗方式推广。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】Objective To investigate the clinical application effect of uterine artery infusion chemoembolization (UACE) combined with ultrasound-guided curettage in the treatment of scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods The clinical data of 150 CSP patients admitted from March 2016 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different treatment methods, 107 patients undergoing UACE combined with ultrasound- guided curettage were divided into observation group and 43 patients undergoing curettage after methotrexate (MTX) chemotherapy were divided into control group. The clinical therapeutic effect, curettage operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative bleeding time, hospitalization time and blood-HCG decrease to normal time were compared between the two groups. Results 105 of 107 patients in the observation group were successful in curettage. The operation time of curettage, the intraoperative bleeding volume, the postoperative bleeding volume, the postoperative bleeding time, the hospitalization time, and the blood-HCG decreased to normal time. all of which were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no serious complications after embolization in the observation group, of which 2 cases (1.8%) failed curettage, all of which belonged to type Ⅲ CSP, and were treated with laparoscopic pregnancy removal and uterine repair. In the control group, 6 cases (13.9%) failed in curettage. Uterine artery embolization was performed to stop bleeding in emergency due to more bleeding during curettage. The curettage was successful again after operation. Conclusion Uterine artery infusion chemoembolization (UACE) combined with ultrasound-guided curettage in the treatment of scar pregnancy has definite curative effect, less trauma and quick recovery, which can realize the patient's nursing desire and should be popularized as a routine treatment method in clinic.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-06-03
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司