墙式浮标氧气吸入器不同倾斜角度引起患者误吸的相关性
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心(四川大学华西医院)立项资助课题(Z2018B19)


Correlation of patients’ aspiration caused by different tilt angles of wall buoy oxygen inhaler
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 探讨墙式浮标氧气吸入器(简称吸入器)不同倾斜角度引起患者误吸的相关性因素。 方法 将常用的吸入器分为两组,即可重复消毒湿化瓶吸入器(A组)和一次性湿化瓶吸入器(B组)。每组各30个。两组研究对象均采用logistic回归分析法分析导致溢液风险的湿化液水容量、氧流量及倾斜角度等因素。 结果 当A组倾角≤-70°或≥85°及B组倾角≤-65°或≥65°时,湿化瓶发生溢液。A组在倾角-90°~0°时,湿化液的水容量越多,溢液风险越高(OR=1.435,P<0.0001);氧流量越大,溢液风险越高(OR=2.792,P=0.003);倾斜角度越大,溢液风险越高(OR=6.523,P<0.0001)。A组在倾角0°~90°时,溢液风险与湿化液的水容量、氧流量、倾斜角度无相关性(P>0.05)。B组在倾角-90°~0°时,出气口接头旋转角度越小,溢液风险越高(OR=0.994,P<0.0001);倾斜角度越大,溢液风险越高(OR=1.173,P<0.0001)。B组在倾角0°~90°时,出气口接头旋转角度越大,溢液风险越高(OR=1.007,P<0.0001);倾斜角度越大,溢液风险越高(OR=1.143,P<0.0001)。B组溢液风险与氧流量无相关性(P>0.05)。 结论 墙式浮标氧气吸入器在使用过程中存在湿化器溢液的安全隐患。使用可重复消毒湿化瓶,吸入器倾角≤-70°或≥85°时,湿化瓶发生溢液;使用一次性湿化瓶,吸入器倾角≤-65°或≥65°时,湿化瓶发生溢液。故当吸入器倾斜角度≤-65°或者≥65°就有产生误吸的风险。为了避免这种安全隐患,有必要固定或限制吸入器的倾斜范围在-65°~65°之间。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To study the related factors of patients' aspiration caused by different tilt angles of wall buoy oxygen inhaler. Methods The commonly used inhalers were divided into repeatable disinfection humidification bottle group (group A) and disposable humidification bottle group (group B). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the water capacity, oxygen flow rate and inclination angle of the humidified liquid which led to the risk of spillage. Results When the inclination angle of group a ≤ - 70° or ≥85° and the inclination angle of group B ≤ -65° or ≥65°, overflow occurs in the humidifying bottle. In group A, when the inclination angle was 90° to 0°, the more water capacity of humidified liquid was, the higher the risk of overflow was (OR=1.435, P<0.0001). The higher the oxygen flow rate, the higher the risk of spillage (OR=2.792, P=0.003). The higher the inclination angle, the higher the risk of spillage (OR=6.523, P<0.0001). In group A, there was no correlation between the risk of overflow and the water capacity, oxygen flow rate and inclination angle of humidified liquid (P>0.05). In group B, the smaller the rotation angle of outlet joint was, the higher the risk of spillage was (OR=0.994, P<0.0001). The higher the inclination angle, the higher the risk of spillage (OR=1.173, P<0.0001). In group B, the greater the rotation angle of outlet joint was, the higher the risk of spillage was (OR=1.007, P<0.0001). The higher the inclination angle, the higher the risk of spillage (OR =1.143, P<0.0001). There was no correlation between the risk of overflow and oxygen flow in group B (P>0.05). Conclusion The wall buoy oxygen inhaler does have potential safety hazard in the process of use, and there is a risk of aspiration when the inclination angle of the inhaler is ≤-65 °or ≥ 65 °. In order to avoid this hidden danger, it is necessary to fix or limit the inclination range of the inhaler between -65 °and 65 °.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-02
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司