前锯肌平面联合胸横肌平面阻滞在乳腺癌改良根治术中的临床应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Clinical effect of serratus anterior muscle plane block combined with transverse thoracic muscle block in modified radical mastectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨超声引导下前锯肌平面联合胸横肌平面阻滞在乳腺癌改良根治术中的围术期镇痛效果及对术后早期恢复质量的影响。方法 选取2019年1月~2019年10月在我院择期行乳腺癌改良根治术患者105例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为3组:单纯全身麻醉组(G组)、前锯肌平面阻滞组(S组)、前锯肌平面联合胸横肌平面阻滞组(ST组)。S组和ST组在超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞或胸横肌平面阻滞均于麻醉诱导前进行。记录患者术前和术后24 h QoR15恢复质量评分,患者入室时(T0)、切皮前(T1)、切皮时(T2)、乳腺内侧手术操作时(T3)及拔管后5 min(T4)平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR),术中丙泊酚及瑞芬太尼用量,评价拔管后30 min(T5)、术后2 h(T6)、4 h(T7)、8 h(T8)、12 h(T9)及24 h(T10)视觉模拟评分(VAS),对比术后补救镇痛次数及并发症的发生率。结果 S组和ST组术后24 h QoR15总分、疼痛评分、生理舒适度评分、情绪状态评分高于G组,ST组术后24 h QoR15总分、疼痛评分、生理舒适度评分高于S组(均P<0.05);ST组患者在T2、T3、T4时间点MAP及HR低于G组和S组(P<0.05);S组和ST组术中丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量均低于G组,其中ST组患者瑞芬太尼用量均低于S组(均P<0.05),丙泊酚用量无明显差异(P>0.05);S组和ST组术后24 h内VAS评分均低于G组,其中在T6~T9时间点ST组低于S组(均P<0.05);S组和ST组术后补救镇痛次数和头晕发生率低于G组(P<0.05),但S组与ST组之间无明显差异(P>0.05);3组术后恶心呕吐发生率无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 对于乳腺癌改良根治术患者,前锯肌平面联合胸横肌平面阻滞的围术期镇痛效果较理想,可明显减少围术期镇痛药物用量,降低术后头晕的发生率,提高患者术后早期恢复质量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the perioperative analgesic effect of serratus anterior muscle plane block combined with transverse thoracic muscle block under ultrasound guidance in modified radical mastectomy and its effect on early postoperative recovery. Methods 105 patients with elective modified radical mastectomy were selected and randomly divided into general anesthesia group (group G), serratus anterior plane block group (group S), serratus anterior plane combined with transverse thoracic muscle block group (ST group). The serratus anterior plane block or transverse thoracic muscle block was performed before anesthesia induction in group S and group ST. The QoR15 recovery quality scores were recorded before and 24 h after surgery. Patients mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at room admission (T0), before skin incision (T1), skin incision (T2), medial breast operation (T3), and 5min after extubation (T4) . The amount of propofol and remifentanil during the operation was recorded. The visual analogue scores (VAS) at 30min after extubation (T5), 2h (T6), 4h (T7), 8h (T8), 12h (T9), and 24h (T10) after operation were evaluated. The number of postoperative analgesia and the incidence of complications were recorded. Results The total QoR15 score, pain score, physiological comfort score, and emotional score of the S group and the ST group were higher than those of the G group at 24h (P<0.05). The total QoR15 score, pain score, physiology and comfort score at 24h after operation in the ST group was higher than that of group S (P<0.05). The MAP and HR of patients in group ST at T2, T3, and T4 were lower than those of group G and S (P<0.05). The amounts of propofol and remifentanil in the S and ST groups were lower than those in the G group (P<0.05). The dosage of remifentanil in the ST group was lower than that in the S group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the amount of propofol (P>0.05). The VAS scores were lower within 24 hours after surgery in the S group and the ST group compared with group G (P<0.05). The ST group was lower than the S group at the T6T9 time point (P<0.05). The number of postoperativeanalgesia and the incidence of dizziness was lower in the S and ST groups than in the G group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>005. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the three groups(P>0.05).〖WTHZ〗Conclusion For patients with modified radical mastectomy, the analgesic effect of the serratus anterior plane block combined with the transverse thoracic muscle plane block is more complete during the perioperative period, which not only can significantly reduce the amount of perioperative analgesics,but aslo reduce the incidence of dizziness and improves patients' early recovery quality.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-28
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司