预先小切口辅助腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术临床疗效观察
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81172832,81771723);四川省杰出青年基金(2013JQ0020);四川省青年科技创新研究团队(2014TD0010);四川省卫生和计划生育委员会项目(110190)


The clinical effect of presmall incision in laparoscopicassisted radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 探讨预先小切口辅助腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2014年7月~2017年4月我院收治的156例远端胃癌患者的临床资料,将50例行预先小切口辅助腹腔镜手术患者设为预先小切口组,48例行全腹腔镜手术患者设为全腹腔镜组,58例行开腹手术患者设为开腹组。观察3组患者性别、年龄、BMI、肿瘤直径、术前麻醉ASA分级、吻合方式、TNM分期、术前合并症,手术切口长度、手术时间、清扫No.4d、5、6、7、8、12组淋巴结时间及出血量、术中出血量、术中淋巴结清扫数量、首次排气时间、术后下床活动时间、术后24、72h疼痛评分,术后使用止痛药物次数、术后住院时间、术后并发症,比较3组患者临床疗效。结果 预先小切口组切口长度显著短于开腹组,但较全腹腔镜组长,差异有统计学意义(P<005);预先小切口组手术时间、清扫No.4d、5、6、7、8、12组淋巴结时间及出血量均小于全腹腔镜组,差异有统计学意义(P<005);与开腹组相比差异无统计学意义(P>005);预先小切口组术中出血量、首次排气时间、术后下床活动时间及术后24、72h疼痛评分、术后使用止痛药物次数、术后住院时间均优于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<005),与全腹腔镜组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>005)。结论 预先小切口辅助腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术安全、省时、出血量少,值得临床推广应用。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To explore the clinical effect of presmall incision in laparoscopyassisted radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer. Methods The clinical data of 156 patients with distal gastric cancer were collected from Sichuan Province People's Hospital from July 2014 to April 2017. Among them, 50 patients with presmall incision laparoscopicassisted surgery were enrolled in presmall incision group, 48 patients with totally laparoscopic surgery in total laparoscopy group and 58 patients with open abdominal in open surgery group. The age, BMI, tumor diameter, gender, preoperative anesthesia ASA classification, anastomosis, TNM staging, preoperative complications, surgical incision length, operation time, cleaning No.4d, 5,6,7,8, 12 groups of lymph node time and blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, number of intraoperative lymph node dissections, first discharge time, postoperative bedtime, postoperative 24hour and 72hour pain scores, number of postoperative pain medications, postoperative Hospitalization time, postoperative complications, and clinical efficacy of the three groups were analyzed. Results The incision length in the presmall incision group was significantly shorter than that in the open abdominal group, but longer than that in total laparoscopy group (P<005). In the presmall incision group, the operation time, the time and the amount of blood loss for lymph node dissection of No. 4d, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 were less than those in the total laparoscopy group (P<005), but no significant difference compared with the open surgry group,(P>005). There were statistically significant difference in bleeding amount during surgery, anus exhaust time,the postoperative ambulation time, the postoperative 24h、72h pain score, the frequency of using pain medication and postoperative hospital stay between the presmall incision group and open surgery group (P<005), but no significant difference compared with the total laparoscopy group(P>005).Conclusion The presmall incisionassisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has been proved to be a safe and timesaving procedure with small amount of blood loss and short learning curve and is worth to be popularized.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-02-25
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司