丙泊酚镇静对颅脑外伤患者术后再出血及预后的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Effects of propofol sedation on rebleeding and prognosis afteroperation in patients with traumatic brain injury
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 探讨丙泊酚镇静对颅脑外伤患者术后再出血及临床预后的影响。方法 收集我院2015年2月~2017年1月收治的颅脑外伤患者131例,按照治疗方法不同分为对照组(62例)和观察组(69例),对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。对照组术后予以常规治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用丙泊酚镇静治疗,观察两组患者术后Riker镇静躁动评分(SedationAgitation Scale,SAS)、颅内压(Intracranial pressure,ICP)、心率(Heart rate,HR)、收缩压(Systolic blood pressure,SBP)、舒张压(Diastolic blood pressure,DBP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)等指标,行组间差异性分析,比较两组患者术后再出血率、病死率及术后6个月时格拉斯哥预后评分(Glasgow Outcome Scale,GOS)。结果 观察组患者SAS、ICP在术后1、2、4、8 h各个时间点均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<005);两组患者的HR、SBP、DBP在术后1h差异无统计学意义(P>005),但在术后2、4、8 h差异有统计学意义(P<005);观察组再出血率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<005);观察组病死率低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>005);术后六个月时格拉斯哥预后评分观察组与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。结论〓颅脑外伤患者术后使用丙泊酚镇静能避免剧烈躁动,减少再出血发生率,改善患者远期预后,提高生存质量。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of postoperative propofol sedation on rebleeding and clinical prognosis in patients with traumatic brain injury. Methods The clinical data of 131 patients with traumatic brain injury included in the February 2015 to January 2017 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results The levels of sedationagitation scale (SAS) and intracranial pressure (ICP) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1 h, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h after operation, with statistical significance (P<005). There were no significant differences in heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure(DBP) between the two groups at 1 h after operation (P> 005), but there was significant difference between the two groups at 2 h, 4 h and 8 h after operation (P<005). The rate of rebleeding in the observation group(725%) was lower than that in the control group (1935%), with statistical significance (P<005). The mortality rate in the observation group (870%) was lower than that in the control group (1452%), with no statistically significant (P>005). The glasgow outcome scale (GOS) of the observation group was better than that of the control group at 6 months after operation, with statistical significance (P<005). Conclusion Postoperative sedation in patients with traumatic brain injury can avoid severe restlessness, reduce the incidence of rebleeding, and improve longterm prognosis with better quality of life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-06-28
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司