精准肝切除术与非规则性肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石患者临床疗效对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

陕西省科学技术研究发展计划项目(2012K16-09-014)


Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of precise hepatectomy and irregular hepatectomy in the treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】目的 对比精准肝切除术与非规则性肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石患者的临床疗效, 旨在为临床治疗提供相应的循证依据。方法 选取本院在2014年10月~2016年8月收治的96例肝内胆管结石患者。将患者按照不同治疗方式分为观察组与对照组, 每组各48例。观察组患者采用精准肝切除术治疗, 对照组患者采用非规则性肝切除术治疗。比较两组患者结石清除率、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、住院费用以及术后并发症的影响, 同时观察患者术后肝功能指标[丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、总胆红素(TBIL)、总胆汁酸(TBA)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)]变化情况。结果 两组住院时间、治疗费用、术中出血量比较,观察组均少于对照组(P<0.05); 手术治疗时间观察组长于对照组(P<0.05); 治疗后, 观察组康复优所占比例高于对照组(P<0.05), 良所占比例低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者差所占比例比较无差异(P>0.05), 观察组临床治疗疗效优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者结石清除率高于对照组(χ2=11.090, P=0.001);治疗前两组患者ALT、TBIL、TBA、ALP、GGT比较无差异(P>0.05), 治疗后两组患者ALT、TBIL、TBA、ALP、GGT均有改善, 但是观察组患者改善程度优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 精准肝切除术与非规则性肝切除治疗肝内胆管结石, 除了手术时间长于非规则性肝切除术外, 在临床疗效、肝功能改善、结石清除率以及降低并发症等方面均优于对照组, 并能减少术后住院时间以及住院费用, 可在临床推广应用。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of precise hepatectomy and irregular hepatectomy in the treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones and provide the theoretical basis for clinical treatment. Methods 96 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones were selected as subjects admitted to our hospital from October 2014 to August 2016. Patients were divided into observation group and control group (48 cases in each group) according to different treatment methods. The patients in the observation group were treated with precise hepatectomy, and the patients in the control group were treated with irregular hepatectomy. The stone clearance rate, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stays, hospitalization expenses, postoperative complications and liver function indexes (ALT, TBIL, TBA, ALP, GGT) changes of the two groups were observed. Results The hospitalization time, treatment costs, the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group were less than that of the control group (P<0.05). The surgical treatment time of observation group was longer than that of the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of Kangfuyou in the observation group (7500%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (47.92%)(P<0.05). The proportion of benign (2083%) was significantly lower than that of control group (45.83%) (P<0.05). No difference was detected between the two groups (P>0.05). The clinical curative effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<005). The removal rate of stones in the observation group was [93.75% (45/48)]and the control group was [6667% (32/48)]. The removal rate of stones in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=11.090, P=0.001). ALT, TBIL, TBA, ALP, GGT were not significantly different between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). ALT, TBIL, TBA, ALP and GGT were improved in the two groups after treatment,but the improvement of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group (12.50%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (31.25%) (P<0.05). Conclusion Intrahepatic choledocholithiasis is treated with precise hepatectomy and irregular liver resection. The operation time is longer than the irregular liver resection. The clinical treatment, liver function improvement, stone clearance rate and the complications and other aspects of the observation group are better than that of the control group. It can reduce the length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-12-18
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司