高频振荡通气与常频机械通气治疗新生儿气胸的临床对照研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

陕西省医学会科研基金(2697)


Controlled clinical research of HFOV and CMV in treating neonatal pneumothorax
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 研究高频振荡通气(High frequency oscillatorg ventilation,HFOV)与常频机械通气(Conventional menchanical ventilation,CMV)治疗新生儿气胸的临床疗效,寻找更适合与优越性的通气方法。方法 选取新生儿病房在2013年10月~2016年2月收治的80例需要机械通气治疗的气胸新生儿。按治疗方法分为两组,观察组40例采用高频振荡通气(HFOV)治疗;对照组40例则采用常频机械通气(CMV)治疗。观察两组患儿在不同时期的血气分析指标及肺功能恢复时间,两组患儿治疗疗效与有无并发症。结果 两组患儿一般资料及原发病构成比较,差异无统计学意义(P>005)。两组患儿在治疗前氧分压(PaO2)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、氧合指数(OI)、动脉/肺泡氧分压(a/APO2)的比较,差异无统计学意义(P>005)。两组患儿治疗4、8、12、24、48h后,观察组和对照组各时段PaO2值均较治疗前上升(P<005);PaCO2值较治疗前下降(P<005);OI值较治疗前明显下降(P<005);a/APO2值较治疗前升高(P<005)。但观察组治疗4、8、12、24、48h时后PaO2、PaCO2、OI、a/APO2值改善情况明显优于对照组,(P<005)。观察组呼吸机平均使用时间为(37±13)/d明显短于对照组的(71±18)/d(P<005)。观察组X线胸片恢复时间为(41±19)/d明显短于对照组的(95±23)/d(P<005)。治疗过程中两组患者无明显并发症情况发生(P>005)。结论 HFOV和CMV两种通气治疗新生儿气胸均有明显效果,但HFOV的临床治疗疗效更好,检测血气分析指标及肺功能改善更明显,且安全性更高,无明显并发症,更适合治疗新生儿气胸。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of HFOV and CMV in treating neonatal pneumothorax and find more suitable ventilation method.Methods 80 patients with neonatal pneumothorax in our hospital from October 2013 to February 2016 were selected and divided into observation group and control group. The observation group was treated with HFOV and control group with CMV. The blood gas analysis index, lung function recovery time, treatment effect and adverse reactions were observed.Results General information and constituent ratio of primary disease of the two groups had no statistic significance (P>005). Before treatment, the difference between PaO2, PaCO2 and OI, a/APO2 of the two groups had no statistic significance (P>005). PaO2 and a/APO2 after treatment of observation group were increased compared that before treatment (P<005). PaCO2 and OI after treatment of observation group were declined compared with that before treatment (P<005). PaO2 and a/APO2 of control group were increased compared with that before treatment. PaCO2 and OI of control group were declined compared with that before treatment. Improvement of PaO2, PaCO2, OI and a/APO2 of observation group after treatment were better than that of control group (P<005). Breathing machine average usage time of observation group [(37±13)d] was obviously shorter than that of control group [(71±18)d](P<005). X-ray chest radiograph recovery time of observation group [(41±19)d] was shorter than that of control group [(95±23)d](P<005). No adverse reactions occurred during treatment in the two groups.Conclusion Clinical effect of HFOV is better than that of CMV, which can improve blood gas analysis index and lung function.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-06-20
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司