常规超声与超声造影及增强CT对弥漫性肝癌的诊断价值比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

四川省卫生厅科研课题(130467)


The role of contrastenhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 比较常规超声、超声造影及增强CT对弥漫性肝癌的诊断价值。方法 回顾性分析42例弥漫性肝癌患者的常规超声、超声造影和增强CT表现,并对三种检查诊断结果进行对比。结果 常规超声对弥漫性肝癌的诊断准确率为38.1%(16/42),超声造影对弥漫性肝癌的诊断准确率为81.0%(34/42),增强CT对弥漫性肝癌的诊断准确率为83.3%(35/42)。超声造影与增强CT对弥漫性肝癌的诊断准确率明显高于常规超声(P<0.05);超声造影和增强CT诊断的准确率比较,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与常规超声检查结果相比,超声造影提高了弥漫性肝癌的诊断准确率,且与增强CT诊断准确率相近。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To compare the diagnostic value of conventional ultrasonography, contrastenhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and contrastenhanced CT in diffusetype hepatocellular carcinoma (DHCC).Methods42 DHCC patients were treated with conventional ultrasound, ultrasonic imaging and enhanced CT performance.ResultsThe accuracy identify DHCC of conventional ultrasonography, CEUS and contrast enhanced CT were was 38% (16/42), 81% (34/42) and 83% (35/42). The accurate diagnosis rates in the CEUS and contrastenhance CT were significantly higher than that in the conventional ultrasonography (P<0.05).There was no difference between CEUS and contrast-enhance CT. Conclusions Compared with conventional ultrasonography,CEUS can increase the diagnostic accuracy in the DHCC.That is similar to contrastenhance CT.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-06-16
您是第位访问者
网站版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403 本网站支持 IPv6    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司