分子吸附再循环系统治疗脓毒症肝衰竭的临床疗效
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

天津市人民医院院级课题(2020YJ024)


Clinical efficacy of molecular adsorption recirculation system in the treatment of septic liver failure
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨分子吸附再循环系统(MARS)治疗脓毒症肝衰竭的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2020年11月—2021年9月天津市人民医院重症医学科收治的15例脓毒症肝衰竭患者的临床资料。15例患者均接受包括针对脓毒症的抗感染治疗,基础疾病和并发症治疗,依据患者血液净化治疗方式分为MARS组及对照组。MARS组9例患者共进行MARS治疗25次,平均每例2.5次;对照组6例共进行连续血液透析滤过(CVVHDF)治疗14次治,平均每例2.3次。比较两组患者治疗前后心率、平均动脉压、肝功能、肾功能、凝血功能、炎症因子及治疗效果等方面的变化。结果 治疗后MARS组在稳定心率、平均动脉压,清除胆红素及炎症因子IL-6、TNF-α、IL-10等明显优于对照组(P<0.05);两组清除血氨、乳酸、尿素、肌酐及凝血功能(血小板、PT-INR)比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在治疗效果方面,MARS组优于对照组(64.00% vs28.60%,χ2=4.509,P=0.034)。结论 对于脓毒症肝衰竭患者MARS治疗较CVVHDF治疗血流动力学稳定性好,清除毒素更为全面,既能清除与蛋白结合的毒素,又能清除水溶性毒素,凝血方面具有安全性,具有更好的临床疗效

    Abstract:

    Objective To study the clinical effect of molecular adsorption recirculating system in the treatment of septic liver failure. Methods The clinical data of 15 patients with septic liver failure treated with molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) or continuous hemodialysis filtration (CVVHDF) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received anti-infection treatment including treatment for sepsis, basic diseases and complications. The patients were divided into MARS group and control group according to the treatment method of blood purification. 9 patients in MARS group were treated with MARS for 25 times, with an average of 2.5 times per case. In the control group, 6 patients were treated with CVVHDF 14 times, with an average of 2.3 times per patient. The changes of heart rate, mean arterial pressure, liver function, renal function, coagulation function, inflammatory factors and treatment effect were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results After treatment, in MARS group, after stable heart rate (80.96±10.80 vs 89.29±13.44, P=0.041), mean arterial pressure (82.81±7.21 vs 76.64±10.06, P=0.032), bilirubin (151.95±45.18 vs 183.41±38.69, P=0.035), inflammatory factor IL-6 (55.59±29.90 vs 93.47±61.96, P=0.039), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) were removed- α (19.92±7.54 vs 28.00±9.87, P=0.014) and interleukin-10 (12.55±4.56 vs 19.00±10.08, P =0.038) were significantly superior to the control group. There was no significant difference between MARS group and control group in the clearance of blood ammonia, lactic acid, urea, creatinine and other small molecular substances (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between MARS group and control group in the influence of coagulation function (platelet, PT-INR) (P>0.05). In terms of treatment effect, MARS group was better than the control group (64.00% vs 28.60%, P=0.034). Conclusion Compared with CVVHDF, MARS treatment for septic liver failure has better hemodynamic stability and more comprehensive toxin clearance. It can not only remove protein-bound toxins, but also remove water-soluble small and medium molecular toxins. It is safe in coagulation and has better clinical efficacy

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-20
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司