收肌管阻滞和股神经阻滞在半月板术后的应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Application of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block after meniscus surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨收肌管阻滞(ACB)和股神经阻滞(FNB)在半月板修复术后对镇痛效果和肌力的影响。 方法 选取拟在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下行单侧膝关节镜下半月板修复术的60例患者为研究对象,随机分为收肌管阻滞组(ACB组)、股神经阻滞组(FNB组)及蛛网膜下腔阻滞组(SA组)三组,每组20例。其中ACB组和FNB组在麻醉前超声引导下行ACB和FNB,用药为0.3%罗哌卡因15mL。记录术后4、8、12、24h时三组的静息和主动运动的NRS评分,各时间点股四头肌肌力分级,术后镇痛药用量及用药副作用,ACB组和FNB组在超声引导下神经阻滞操作时间及相关并发症。结果 术后各时间点SA组NRS评分均明显高于ACB组和FNB组(均P<0.05),而ACB组和FNB组NRS评分差异不明显(P>0.05);术后4、8、12h时,SA组和ACB组股四头肌肌力明显高于FNB组(P<0.05),但术后24h时,三组肌力比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);SA组术后镇痛药用量比ACB和FNB组明显增高(P<0.05),且恶心呕吐发生率较高;与ACB组比较,FNB组神经阻滞操作时间短,但两组差异不明显(P>0.05),且均无明显神经阻滞并发症。结论 FNB和ACB均可提供良好的术后早期镇痛,但ACB对股四头肌肌力影响小,患者能在无痛下及早进行术后功能锻炼,更有利于其关节功能的恢复。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effects of adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block group (FNB) on analgesia and muscle strength after meniscus repair. Methods 60 patients with unilateral arthroscopic meniscus repair under subarachnoid block were selected. They were randomly divided into adductor canal block group, femoral nerve block group and subarachnoid block group with 20 cases in each group. In the ACB group and FNB group, ACB and FNB were guided by ultrasound before anesthesia, and the drug was 0.3% ropivacaine 15ml. NRS scale at rest and movement in postoperative 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, quadriceps muscle strength, additional analgesic dose and side effects were recorded. Results The NRS scores of SA group were significantly higher than those of ACB group and FNB group at each time point after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in NRS score between ACB group and FNB group. At 4, 8 and 12 h after operation, there was no significant difference in quadriceps muscle strength between SA group and ACB group, but significantly higher than FNB group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in muscle strength between the three groups at 24 hours after operation. The dosage of analgesics in the SA group was significantly higher than that in the ACB and FNB groups (P<0.05), and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher than that in the ACB and FNB groups. Compared with ACB group, the operation time of nerve block in FNB group was shorter than that in ACB group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups and there were no obvious complications of nerve block. Conclusion Both FNB and ACB can provide good early postoperative analgesia, but the effect of ACB on quadriceps muscle strength is small, so that patients can perform postoperative functional exercise without pain, which is more conducive to the recovery of joint function.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-09-02
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司