Abstract:【Abstract】 Objective To comparative the clinical value of qSOFA score and CURB65 score on predicting the severity and prognosis of communityacquired pneumonia (CAP) with sepsis in Emergency Department. Methods The clinical data of communityacquired pneumonia with sepsis of adult patients were collected retrospectively from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The qSOFA score and CURB65 score were calculated at admission. The clinical value of qSOFA score and CURB65 score on Predicting the 28day mortality of communityacquired pneumonia with sepsis were compared by ROC curve analysis. According to the Cut off value divided into two groups. Comparative the efficacy of two scoring methods on predicting the average hospital stay of ICU, the 28day mechanical ventilation and the 28day mortality. Results 428 patients were included, including male 284 cases, female 144 cases, the average age of 60 ± 1743 years old. The area under the curves of 28day mortality of CAP with sepsis assessed by the qSOFA score and CURB65 score were 0670 (95% CI= 0611 ~ 0729), 0639 (95% CI= 0578 ~ 0700) respectively. Both cutoff values are 2 points. The ICU average length of hospital stay、28day mechanical ventilation and 28day mortality were significantly higher in qSOFA≥2 group and CURB65≥2 group than those in qSOFA <2 group and CURB65 <2 group respectively (P <005). The 28day mechanical ventilation and 28day mortality were higher in the qSOFA≥2 group than in the CURB65≥2 group (P <005), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 005). The ICU average length of stay、 28day mechanical ventilation and 28day mortality were no significant difference between qSOFA<2 group and CURB65<2 group(P>005. Conclusion The qSOFA score and CURB65 score all have the clinical value on predicting the severity and prognosis of CAP with sepsis in Emergency Department. However, the qSOFA score is better than the CURB65 score to identify critically ill patients and predict poor prognosis.