自我效能干预对维持性血液透析患者的临床价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

四川省卫计委应用研究课题(150130)


The clinical value of self efficacy intervention in maintenance hemodialysis patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】〓目的〓探讨自我效能护理干预对维持性血液透析患者的临床价值。方法〓 选取2014年12月~2016年5月本院血透中心行维持性血液透析治疗的128例患者为研究对象,按护理干预方法将其分为对照组和干预组,每组64例,对照组患者在维持性血液透析治疗上予以常规临床护理,干预组在维持性血液透析治疗上予以自我效能护理模式进行干预,两组患者均干预6个月,干预结束后记录所有患者自我护理能力、负性情绪变化及生存质量情况,并比较两组患者间上述情况的差异,为临床上维持性血液透析患者护理干预模式的选择进一步提供有力的证据。结果〓①两组患者干预前自我护理能力比较均无差异(P>005),干预后其评分均较干预前提高,且干预组评分提高程度远大于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<005)。②两组患者干预前SAS、SDS及HADS评分均无差异(P>005),干预后均较干预前降低,且干预组降低程度明显大于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<005)。③两组患者干预前SF36各维度评分比较均无差异(P>005),干预后均较干预前提高,且干预组各维度及总分提高程度均大于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<005)。④干预组患者对护理的总满意度(9844%)明显高于对照组(8750%),组间差异有统计学意义(P<005)。结论〓自我效能护理干预可明显提高维持性血液透析患者的自我护理能力和生存质量,且可明显改善患者的负性情绪,更易被患者所接受。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】〓Objective〓To investigate The clinical value of self efficacy intervention in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Methods 〓128 patients underwent maintenance hemodialysis in our hospital from December 2014 to May 2016 were selected and divided into control group and interventional group, 64 cases in each group. Control group was given maintenance hemodialysis and regular clinic nursing. Interventional group was given maintenance hemodialysis and selfefficacybased nursing intervention. They were all treated for 6 months. The selfcare ability, negative emotion and life quality were observed. Results〓Selfcare ability of the two groups before intervention had no difference (P>005). After intervention, scores all increased, and the scores of interventional group increased more than that of control group (P<005). SAS, SDS and HADS of the two groups before intervention had no difference (P>005). After intervention, scores of the two groups all reduced, and scores of interventional group reduced more than that of control group (P<005). SF36 scores of the two groups before intervention had no difference (P>005). After intervention, scores of the two groups all increased, and scores of interventional group improved more than that of control group (P<005); Satisfaction rate of interventional group (9844%) was larger than control group (8750%) (P<005). Conclusion〓Selfefficacybased nursing intervention can improve selfcare ability, life quality, negative emotion of patients with maintenance hemodialysis and reduce complication incidence and it is more easily accepted by common patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-11-10
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司