聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯与自固化磷酸钙骨水泥治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折的疗效对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

佛山市科学技术项目(2015AB000802)


Comparative study of clinical outcome of pmma and cpc in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 对比聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)与自固化磷酸钙骨水泥(CPC)治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折(OVCF)的临床疗效。方法 将2013年9月~2015年9月我院收治的90例OVCF患者随机分为两组,均采用经皮椎体成形术(PVP)填充骨水泥治疗:观察组45例采用CPC作为骨水泥材料,对照组45例采用PMMA作为骨水泥材料;对比两组治疗7 d后的临床疗效、活动功能恢复情况(EVOS评分、ODI评分)、椎体形态(伤椎前中柱椎体高度和后凸Cobb角角度)及随访1年新发骨折情况。结果 两组患者治疗7 d后,总有效率均达到9778%,临床疗效无差异(P> 005);两组EVOS评分、伤椎前中柱椎体高度和后凸Cobb角角度在治疗后均有明显改善(P < 005),改善程度观察组与对照组无明显差异(P>005);ODI评分(t = 5433,P < 005)及随访1年新发骨折观察组好于对照组(P < 005)。结论 聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯与自固化磷酸钙骨水泥治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折均有较好的临床疗效,就疼痛改善的速度和远期效果比较,自固化磷酸钙骨水泥作为PVP填充材料更好。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical outcome of PMMA and CPC in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods 90 OVCF patients treated with percutaneous vertebral plasty (PVP) were divided into control group and observation group. CPC were used as PVP cement in observation group, while PMMA were used in control group. The clinical efficacy, EVOS and ODI score, posterior vertebral heights, kyphosis Cobb angle 7 days after surgery and total and adjacent new vertebral fractures after 1 year were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe clinical effective rate of control group and observation group was not obviously different (P> 005). EVOS score, posterior vertebral heights, kyphosis Cobb angle were significantly improved after treatment in the two groups (P < 005), but the difference was not obvious between the two groups (P> 005). ODI score and new vertebral fractures after 1 year of observation group performed significantly better than that of the control group. Conclusion Both PMMA and CPC can act as good methods for PVP treatment in OVCF, but CPC's recent analgesic effect and longtime support effect are superior to those of PMMA.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-08-03
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司