前内侧入路与后侧倒L入路治疗胫骨平台后内侧柱骨折的临床价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(81171472, 81201407);四川省教育厅成果转化重大培育项目(15CZ0021)


The clinical value of anterior medial approach and posterior inverted L approach for the treatment the treatment of tibial plateau fracture of medial column
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 比较前内侧入路与后侧倒L入路治疗胫骨平台后内侧柱骨折患者的临床价值。方法 对50例胫骨平台后内侧柱骨折患者根据手术入路方式不同分为前内侧入路组、后侧倒L入路组,前内侧入路组25例采取前内侧入路手术治疗,后侧倒L入路组25例采取后侧倒L入路手术治疗。术后两组患者进行6个月1年随访,比较两组患者治疗前后关节功能评分、骨折愈合时间、完全负重时间、膝关节活动度、骨折复位情况、关节功能恢复优良率及患者的满意度。结果 后侧倒L入路组的骨折愈合及完全负重时间均明显短于前内侧入路组(P<005);两组患者治疗前关节功能评分无明显差异(P>005),治疗后均较治疗前改善(P<005),且后侧倒L入路组较前内侧入路组改善明显(P<005);治疗后后侧倒L入路组的骨折复位优良率及满意度评分均高于前内侧入路组(P<005);后侧倒L入路组的膝关节活动度也明显优于前内侧入路组(P<005)。结论 后侧倒L入路手术治疗胫骨平台后内侧柱骨折患者临床疗效显著,较前内侧入路术后膝关节功能恢复更好、更快,患者满意度更高,可作为治疗胫骨平台后内侧柱骨折患者的首选方式之一。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical value of of anterior medial approach and posterior inverted L approach for the treatment the treatment of tibial plateau fracture of medial column. Methods The clinical data of 50 medial posterior column fractures of tibial plateau were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical approach, the patients were divided into anterior medial approach group and posterior inverted L approach group. All the patients were followed up for 6 months to 1 year. The joint function score, fracture healing time, full weightbearing time, knee joint activity, fracture reduction, joint function recovery rate and patient satisfaction score were observed. Results Fracture healing and complete weightbearing time of posterior inverted L approach group were significantly shorter than that in anterior medial approach group (P<005). No significant difference was detected in the functional scores of the two groups before treatment (P<005). No significant difference was detected between the two groups in the scores of joint function before treatment (P>005). The joint function scores of the two groups were improved after treatment (P<005), and the scores of the joint function score of posterior inverted L approach group were significantly improved (P<005). The excellent rate and satisfaction score of posterior inverted L approach group were significantly higher than that in anterior medial approach group (P<005). The activity of knee joint in posterior inverted L approach group was significantly superior to that of the medial anterior approach group (P<005). Conclusion The posterior approach of inverted Lposterior approach for the treatment of medial posterior column fracture of the tibial plateau has a significant clinical effect. The function of knee joint recovery is better and faster, the patient's satisfaction is higher, which is beneficial to reduce the occurrence of medical disputes, and a treatment of posterior tibial plateau patients with medial column fracture of the preferred treatment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-08-03
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司