三种食管胃交界部癌手术入路比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

四川省教育厅科研项目资助(14ZB0194)


Comparison of three types of surgery for esophagogastric junction cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 分析食管胃交界部癌手术三种入路方式的围手术期差异,为临床制定手术策略提供参考。方法 回顾性分析144例食管胃交界部癌手术切除病例的临床资料,以手术入路方式分为经腹组(A组)96例,经上腹右胸组(B组)36例,经左胸组(C组)12例。主要分析手术时间、失血量、术后并发症发生率、肿瘤上切缘距肿瘤上缘长度、淋巴结清扫程度和平均住院时间等方面的差异。结果 手术时间:A组[(1969±533)min]<C组[(2050±731)min]<B组[(3092±659)min],上切缘距肿瘤上缘距离:A组[(319±049)cm]<B组[(460±061)cm]及C组[(447±068)cm],隆突淋巴结总数:A组(0个)<B组[(133±023)个]及C组[(100±00)个],隆突淋巴结转移程度:A组(0.0%)<B组(166%)及C组(167%),术后引流量:B组[(3641±2953)ml)]>C组[(1650±1410)ml]>A组[(1628±1192)ml],术后胸腔积液发生率:B组(222%)>A组(52%)及C组(83%),平均住院时间:B组[(241±39)d]>A组[(217±26)d]及C组[(227±33)d],差异均有统计学意义(P<005)。各组肿瘤长度、淋巴结清扫总数、淋巴结转移程度、吻合方法、术后肺部感染发生率、术后吻合口瘘发生率、术后呼吸肌支持时间、术后血浆白蛋白水平和术后乳糜胸或乳糜腹发生率等差异均无统计学意义(P>005)。结论 虽然经上腹右胸联合手术增加了围手术期创伤及术后并发症,但与其他入路方式无实质性差异,而且能充分地进行清扫淋巴结,尤其是隆突部位以上的纵膈淋巴结,肿瘤学根治方面更适合于食管胃交界部肿瘤手术治疗。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Obejective To analyze the differences in perioperative period of esophagogastric junction carcinoma resection, and to provide reference for clinical surgical strategy.Methods 144 clinical data of esophagogastric junction carcinoma resection were divided into the surgical approach of transhiatal group (A group, 96 cases), IvorLewis group (B group, 36 cases) and transthoracic group (C group, 12 cases). The operation time, blood loss, postoperative complication rate, the length of tumor resection margin,the degree of lymph node dissection and the average length of stay were analyzed.Results The operation time of group B (3092±659min) was longer than that of group C (205± 731min) and group A (1969± 533min). The postoperative drainage of group B (3641±2953ml) was more than that of group C (165±1410ml) and group A (1628±1192ml). The length of tumor resection margin of group A (219±029cm) was shorter than that of group B (360±041cm) and group C (347±048cm). The incidence of postoperative pleural effusion of group B(222%)was greater than group that of group A(52%)and group C(83%). The average length of stay of group B (241±39)was greater than that of group A(217±26)and group C (227±33). All the differences were statistically significant. The total number of lymph nodes of group A, group B and group C were 0, 133±023 and 100±00. The carina lymph node metastasis of group A, group B and group C were 0%, 166% and 167%,respectively. The total number of lymph node dissection, the degree of lymph node metastasis, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection, anastomotic fistula rate, postoperative plasma albumin levels, anastomosis methods and incidence of chylothorax or chylous abdomen of group A, group B and group C had no significant differences.Conclusion Although the IvorLewis surgery increased the perioperative trauma and postoperative complications, but no substantive differences with other approaches, and can fully clean the lymph nodes, especially the mediastinal lymph nodes above the site of carina. Based on oncology requirements, the IvorLewis maybe the most suitable approach for the esophagogastric junction tumor surgery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-07-19
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司