原发性干燥综合征患者血清TPO及HPA的表达及临床意义
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

陕西省自然科学基金项目(2014JM2-8121)


TPO and HPA expression level and clinic significance of patients with PSS
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 研究原发性干燥综合征患者血清促血小板生成素(TPO)和人类血小板抗原(HPA)的表达水平及临床意义,旨在为临床治疗提供相关理论依据。方法 选取我院临床免疫科2014年2月至2016年2月收治的原发性干燥综合征患者60例作为观察组,另选取来我院做健康体检者60例作为对照组,观察被检者促血清血小板生成素(TPO)与人类血小板抗原(HPA)的表达水平,同时检测其他相关临床指标表达水平。结果 血小板减少组、曾有血小板减少组及血小板正常组患者一般资料比较无差异(P>0.05);观察组血清TPO表达水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组血清HPA表达水平与对照组比较无差异(P>0.05);观察组根据有无血小板减少症再分为血小板减少组、曾有血小板减少组及血小板正常组血清TPO表达水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05),血小板减少组、曾有血小板减少组及血小板正常组三组患者组内比较无差异(P>0.05);血小板减少组、曾有血小板减少组、血小板正常组血清HPA表达水平与正常比较无差异(P>0.05),4组间两两比较无差异(P>0.05);血小板正常组患者lgA、CIC表达水平明显高于血小板减少组及曾有血小板减少组(P<0.05),血小板减少组、曾有血小板减少组及血小板正常组患者WBC、RBC、ESR、CRP、lgG、lgM、C3、C4、SSAAb、SSBAb、HB、lgE各临床指标间比较无差异(P>0.05);lgA、CIC两指标组间多重比较:血小板减少组CIC表达水平与曾有血小板减少组及血小板正常组比较无差异(P>0.05),曾有血小板减少组CIC表达水平与血小板正常组比较有差异(P<0.05);血小板减少组lgA表达水平与曾有血小板减少组比较无差异(P>0.05),血小板正常组lgA表达水平与血小板减少组及曾有血小板减少组比较均有差异(P<0.05),血清TPO表达水平与各临床指标间均无相关性(P>0.05),血清HPA表达水平与临床指标间无相关性(P>0.05),HB与抗SSAAb抗体呈负相关(r=0.335,P<0.05);HB与抗SSBAb抗体呈负相关(r=0.290,P<0.05);抗SSBAb抗体与C4及CIC呈正相关(r=0.289,r=0.312,P<0.05);PLT与IgA呈正相关(r=0.426,P<0.05)。结论 血清TPO及HPA的表达水平可能与原发性干燥综合征发病机制无直接相关性,原发性干燥综合征的发病原因可能是由于患者本身疾病导致的免疫力紊乱所致。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective To investigate PO and HPA expression level and clinic significance of patients with PSS in order to provide basis for clinic treatment. Methods 60 patients with PSS in our hospital from February 2014 to February 2016 were selected as observation group. 60 healthy people were chosen as control group. TPO and HPA expression level and other clinic indexes, including WBC, RBC, PLT, HB, ESR, CRP, ANA, anti SSA antibody, anti SSB antibody, G(IgG), A(IgA), M(IgM), 3(C3), 4(C4) and CIC were observed. Results Difference among thrombopenia group, used thrombopenia group and platelet normal group was not statisticly significant (P>005). TPO expression level of observation group was obviously higher than that of control group (P<005). HPA of the two groups had no statistic significance (P>005). TPO of thrombopenia group, used thrombopenia group and platelet normal group were obviously higher than that of control group (P<005). HPA of thrombopenia group, used thrombopenia group and platelet normal group had no difference from that of control group (P>005). lgA and CIC of platelet normal group were higher than thrombopenia group and used thrombopenia group (P<005). WBC, RBC, ESR, CRP、lgG, lgM, C3, C4, SSAAb, SSBAb, HB and lgE of three groups had no statistic significance (P>005). The difference of CIC between thrombopenia group and used thrombopenia group had no statistic significance (P>005). The difference of CIC between thrombopenia group and platelet normal group had statistic significance (P<005). The difference of lgA between thrombopenia group and used thrombopenia group had no statistic significance (P>005). The difference of lgA between platelet normal group, thrombopenia group and used thrombopenia group had statistic significance (P<005). TPO had no correlation with clinic indexes (P>005). HPA had no correlation with clinic indexes (P>005). HB and anti SSAAb were negatively correlated(r=0335,P<005). HB and anti SSBAb were negatively correlated (r=0290,P<005). anti SSBAb, C4 and CIC were positively correlated (r=0289,r=0312,P<005). PLT and IgA were positively correlated(r=0426,P<005). Conclusion The present study shows that TPO and HPA expression level may had no relation with PPS. The aetiological agent of PSS may caused by immune disorders.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-06-20
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《西部医学》编辑部     蜀ICP备18038379号-4
地址:四川省成都市武侯区小天竺街75号财富国际18F-1号    邮政编码:610041
电话:028-85570072/85588403    E-mail:xbyxqk@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司